Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Marlow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiffs cannot “add allegations or claims by furnishing them for the first time in an opposition to a motion to dismiss”
• “the plaintiffs’ oppositions introduce a plethora of new allegations and legal theories. But the plaintiffs cannot, of course, add allegations or claims by furnishing them for the first time in an opposition to a motion to dismiss”
• “[T]he plaintiffs’ oppositions introduce a plethora of new allegations and legal theories. But the plaintiffs cannot, of course, add allegations or claims by furnishing them for the first time in an opposition to a motion to dismiss”
• “[T]he plaintiffs’ oppositions introduce a plethora of new factual allegations and legal theories. But the plaintiffs cannot, of course, add allegations or claims by furnishing them for the first time in an opposition to a motion to dismiss”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).