Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Heaton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[C]herry-picking of data is unreliable and ‘fails to satisfy the scientific method and Daubert.’”
• “[w]hile a causation opinion need not be based on epidemiological studies, it is well established that the Bradford Hill method used by epidemiologists does require that an association be established through studies with statistically significant results”
• epidemiological studies required for Bradford Hill approach

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).