Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Haverly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that it is not the Court’s burden to dig through the record and assist the claimant with its required allocation between covered and uncovered claims
• “[T]he mere inclusion of a defective component, such as a defective window or the defective installation of a window, does not constitute property damage unless that defective component results in physical injury to some other tangible property.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).