Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Elmore's Administrator

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff had stated an APA claim based in part on allegations that the agency had proffered a pretextual reason for its decision
• holding that plaintiff was “not disqualified from having Article III standing on the basis of its purported lack of capacity”
• holding that dissolved corporate entities still possess Article III standing
• finding that plaintiff's allegation that her \loan application was equally as meritorious as the applications of Tesla and Fisker ... manifestly suffice[d] to establish that [she] [wa]s similarly situated to other ... loan applicants\ for purposes of class-of-one claim
• finding \now-dissolved\ minor player in clean energy market similarly situated to large and sophisticated competitor, Tesla, for purposes of class-of-one equal protection claim
• finding plaintiffs’ complaint did not contain sufficient allegations to survive defendant’s 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss where there were no other similarly situated individuals and there was a rational basis for the differential treatment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).