Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Craft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting summary judgment for defendant when all three physicians who prescribed drug to plaintiff testified that they did not review the manufacturer’s warnings
• “The 15 undisputed facts in the record establish that plaintiff’s physicians did not ever read, let 16 alone rely on, PLIVA’s inadequate 2004 warning.”
• “The 18 undisputed facts in the record establish that plaintiff’s physicians did not ever read, let 19 alone rely on, PLIVA’s inadequate 2004 warning.”
• “The undisputed facts in 7 the record establish that plaintiff’s physicians did not ever read, let alone rely on, 8 PLIVA’s inadequate 2004 warning.”
• “The undisputed facts in the record establish that plaintiff’s physicians did not 15 ever read, let alone rely on, PLIVA’s inadequate 2004 warning.”
• “The 17 undisputed facts in the record establish that plaintiff’s physicians did not ever read, let 18 alone rely on, PLIVA’s inadequate 2004 warning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).