Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. City of Henderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the evidence before the court failed to indicate that the defendant desired to inflict distress or knew that such distress would result as a result of the defendant’s conduct
• denying summary judgment as to plaintiff’s state-law claims of excessive force, battery, and assault, “[f]or the same reasons that summary judgment is denied as to the excessive force claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983”
• “[Brown] contains three underpinnings …. First, the court found that the sheriff provided no training or supervision (at least not formally
• “[Brown] contains three underpinnings …. First, the court found that the sheriff provided no training or supervision (at least not formally
• “[Brown] contains three underpinnings …. First, the court found that the sheriff provided no training or supervision (at least not formally
• no bystander claim where parent did not witness event or arrive at scene soon thereafter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).