Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Sewell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a statement a facts as to the basis of an allegation is only required under the heightened pleading standard of Rule 9(b)
• finding that a complaint survives a motion to dismiss where plaintiff “identifies at least one male comparator” by name and “alleges that the comparator received a higher base salary”
• noting that expressing interest in a promotion gives the defendant notice
• narrowing putative class to include only class members whose claims accrued within applicable limitations period
• denying defendants’ motion to dismiss as premature because plaintiffs had yet to move for conditional collective certification
• narrowing scope of putative class to include only class members whose claims accrued within applicable limitations period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).