Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Risenstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The AFBCMR has discretion in granting a hearing and the AFBCMR’s decision will be upheld if reasonable.” (citation omitted)
• sua sponte identification of 37 U.S.C. § 204(a)(1) (1994) as a money-mandating provision after the plaintiff failed to cite any separate constitutional, statutory or regulatory monetary entitlement
• “The AFBCMR’s decision was reasonable because plaintiffs case was adequately documented.”
• “Military promotion decisions are nonjusticiable issues.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).