Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Renfro's Admr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] [Rule 54(b)] motion may not be used to raise arguments or introduce evidence that could have been addressed or presented previously.”
• A Rule 54(b) motion “may not be used to raise arguments or introduce evidence that could have been addressed or presented previously.” (citations omitted)
• “A motion for reconsideration is not, however, an opportunity to relitigate issues already ruled upon simply because a party is dissatisfied with the outcome.”
• “A motion for reconsideration . . . may not be used to raise arguments or introduce evidence that could have been addressed or presented previously.” (internal citations omitted)
• “[m]otions for reconsideration are inappropriate merely to introduce . . . new evidence that could have been adduced during the pendency of the prior motion” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).