Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Pearcy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the protected species, not the plaintiffs, was best served by the absence of an injunction, the balance of hardships and public interest tipped in favor of the defendants
• “This maxim carries particular significance when a plaintiff seeks an injunction pending appeal following the court's resolution of the case and its dissolution of a preliminary injunction . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).