Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Long

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claim against individual defendant could not proceed where claim against employer was barred by Eleventh Amendment
• finding that a plaintiff’s lawsuit against his employer did not constitute protected activity under the NYSHRL because it did not make “any mention of discrimination”
• finding that plaintiff’s concession that he was under investigation at the time of firing “wholly undermine[d]” his use of temporal proximity between his protected activity and firing to establish causation under Title VII
• granting a motion to dismiss where the plaintiff had “shown no connection between his termination and his gender, race, or national origin”
• dismissing complaint where plaintiff did not allege that the adverse employment action was “caused by a discriminatory motive” as opposed to plaintiff's “other actions”
• dismissing race discrimination claim where plaintiff “show[ed] no connection between his termination and his” race

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).