Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Cox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding claim properly stated even in the absence of allegations identifying “any particular warning language that [plaintiff] feels was missing or misleading,” as the court found “it is clear [plaintiff] is alleging that the warning was deficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).