Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Campbell's Admr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a party’s “narrative version of its own interpretation of the facts fails to comply with Local [ ] Rule 56(B), largely contains argument, and makes it difficult to determine exactly which material facts are disputed”
• refusing to consider new facts presented in narrative format in oppositions to motions for summary judgment because oppositions did not specifically state which undisputed material facts in motions were disputed
• a party’s “narrative version of its own interpretation of the facts fails to comply with Local Civil Rule 56(BY”
• “facts identified by the moving party ... are admitted, unless ... controverted in the statement of genuine facts in opposition to the motion”
• a party’s “narrative version of its own interpretation of the facts fails to comply with Local Civil Rule 56(B)”
• a party’s “narrative version of its own interpretation of the facts fails to comply with Local Civil Rule 56(B), largely contains argument, and makes it difficult to determine exactly which material facts are disputed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).