Louisville & N. R. R. v. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding epithets were “insufficient proof of discrimination” as there was “no nexus between the stray remark[s] and the adverse employment decision.”
• first quoting Kalekiristos v. CTF Hotel Mgmt. Corp., 958 F. Supp. 641, 665 (D.D.C. 1997)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).