Louisville & N. R. R. v. Mink

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a motion for reconsideration is “n[ot] an occasion for repeating old arguments previously rejected”
• “On a Local Rule 6.3 motion, a party may not advance new facts, issues, or arguments, not previously presented to the Court.”
• “Such a motion is ‘neither an occasion for repeating old arguments previously rejected nor an opportunity for making new arguments that could have previously been made.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).