Louisville & N. R. R. v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the “absence of a requirement that a plaintiff asserting a statutory quiet title claim plead ‘invalidity’ ” of the defendant’s mortgage interest
• finding a couple that knowingly signed fraudulent loan documents were precluded from bringing a fraud claim against the bank that gave them the loan
• dismissing claim where plaintiffs made no allegations about defendant’s broader practices or that the defendant sought out purchasers like the one at issue in the complaint among the public
• “to the extent that the complaint alleges causes of action based on ... un-conscionability, those claims are dismissed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).