Louisville, Henderson & St. Louis Railroad v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Plaintiffs cannot point to a set of procedures and argue that the procedures in and off themselves create a property interest.”
• “Although the Court understands that the Board is trying to analogize to the preemptive effect of federal labor law, in this state-law context, it is more appropriate to ask whether the [IELRB] has exclusive jurisdiction to review Plaintiffs’ contract claim.”
• “Plaintiffs cannot point to a set of procedures and argue that the procedures in and of themselves create a property interest. In other words, Plaintiffs can have no property interest in procedures; they can only have an interest in property.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).