Skip to main content
· 12/16/1905

Louisville, H. & St. L. R. v. Hathaway's Ex'tx

Citations

  • 121 Ky. 666
  • 89 S.W. 724
  • 1905 Ky. LEXIS 249

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendants’ addressing the merits of unexhausted claims constitutes a waiver of their objection
  • noting that the McDonnell Douglas framework is used to assess Section 1983 equal protection claims alleging race discrimination on a disparate treatment theory
  • holding time- barred those Title VII claims in which the plaintiff “opted not to act within 90 days of her 2006 EEOC right-to-sue letter”
  • finding that adverse actions occurring within one month of protected activity “are sufficiently close in time to establish a prima facie causal connection”
  • finding that assignment to undesirable units was not an adverse action
  • presuming defendant’s knowledge of plaintiffs EEOC charge “because the EEOC responds to charges of discrimination by investigating the incident with the employer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arm, Barker, From, Half, Him, Just, Nunn, Placing, Relates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.