Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. Sherman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “hostility does not necessarily mean that future applications will be futile”
• “Plaintiffs’ facial claims are not subject to the Williamson test and I decline to dismiss them.”
• “A plaintiff cannot have received a final decision without submitting a plan for development of the property for its intended or another use and seeking available variances or waivers of the requirements at issue.”
• “A plaintiff cannot have received a final decision without submitting a plan for development of the property for its intended or another use and seeking available variances or waivers of the requirements at issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).