Louisville Bridge Co. v. L. & N. R. R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[c]ontractual nonperformance that is merely in a defendant’s economic self-interest does not suffice” to show reckless indifference to the rights of others
• finding money damages in lieu of repurchase appropriate and noting that “where the granting of equitable relief appears to be impossible or impracticable, equity may award damages in lieu of the desired equitable remedy”
• finding money damages in lieu of repurchase appropriate and noting that “where the granting of equitable relief appears to be impossible or impracticable, equity may award damages in lieu of the desired equitable remedy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).