Skip to main content
· 11/24/1971

Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. v. Martin

Citations

  • 47 Ala. App. 371
  • 255 So. 2d 42
  • 1971 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining appropriation as setting “apart from the public revenue a certain sum of money for a specified object, in such manner that the executive officers of the government are authorized to use that money, and no more, for that object and no other”
  • discussing history of appropriations power in British and American governments
  • discussing history of appropriations power in British and American governments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thagard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.