Louismeme v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that testimony of podiatrist as to likelihood that certain pair of sneakers would fit on defendant’s feet was not “scientific” evidence
• podiatrist’s testimony concerning probability that pair of sneakers would fit defendant’s feet not scientific evidence because jury could employ common sense and independent judgment to view and evaluate evidence
• admissibility of expert testimony by podiatrist that sneakers that left prints at crime scene belonged to defendant “did not depend on general acceptance of his theories in the scientific community”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).