· 5/23/1904

Louisiana & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Vicksburg, S. & P. Ry. Co.

Citations

112 La. 915
36 So. 803
1904 La. LEXIS 487

Syllabus

EMINENT DOMAIN — PROPERTY SUBJECT — REVIEW ON APPEAL. 1. Land in public use by one railroad company cannot,' without legislative authority, be taken by another railroad corporation. 2l South. 144, 49 La. Ann. 35. In the case at bar, the locus in quo belongs to defendant, and has been used by both corporations since 1880 as a common station. See McCormick Case, 33 South. 762, 109 La. 764. The appellate jurisdiction of this court embraces all questions of law and of fact, and all the findings of an expropriation jury are reviewable by this court on appeal. (Syllabus by the Court.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that “the requirement obliging McCormack to appear at all court proceedings does not amount to a deprivation”
ruling that the defendant officer was “entitled to qualified immunity with respect to [the] plaintiff’s malicious prosecution claim under the Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process clause.”
reiterating that appearances at court proceedings do not amount to a deprivation of liberty under the Fourth Amendment
plaintiff must satisfy each element to establish malicious prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Land

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.