Skip to main content
· 4/17/2012

LOUISIANA ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION v. Baton Rouge

Citations

  • 677 F.3d 737
  • 2012 WL 1301164

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the district court should determine in the first instance a complex question of law
  • noting that a “sixty-day notice provision is a typical ‘claim-processing rule.’”
  • “The placement of the ‘diligent prosecution’ bar in the ‘Notice’ section, alongside a typical claim-processing rule, suggests that Congress intended the ‘diligent prosecution’ bar to be a claim-processing rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Benavides, Dennis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.