Louisiana Agricultural Corp. v. Interstate Trust & Banking Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “For purposes of the government’s Blockburger argument, we conclude that the crimes for which [defendant] was previously convicted constitute a ‘species of lesser-included offense’ in relation to the civil forfeiture.”
• rejecting 15 reasoning of Tilley and $184,505.01, following $405,089.23

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).