Skip to main content
· 3/10/2005

Louise Cook v. Sheriff of Monroe County

Citations

  • 402 F.3d 1092
  • 66 Fed. R. Serv. 892
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 4014
  • 2005 WL 552483

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a sheriff may be held vicariously liable for the negligent actions of his deputies under Florida law
  • holding that under Florida law a suit against a county sheriff in his official capacity is “effectively a suit against the gov- ernmental entity he represents”
  • holding failure to train and failure to supervise claims were barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity
  • explaining that it is the proponent's burden to lay the foundation for admission of expert testimony
  • explaining that it is the proponent’s burden to lay the foundation for admission of expert testimony
  • stating that a district court may exclude expert testimony when its factual basis is not adequately explained

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hull, Marcus, Hancock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.