Louise Ann Mawn v. Gregg Thomas Tarquinio
Syllabus
During the pendency of a divorce, Husband was convicted of six counts of criminal contempt for violating the statutory injunction under Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-4-106(d). On appeal, Husband contends that the trial court erred in finding that he willfully violated the statute. Because we are unable to determine if the trial court applied an impermissible conclusive presumption to find that Husband was aware of his obligations under the statutory injunction, we vacate and remand to the trial court for reconsideration.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- estopping city from relitigating trial court's decision that identically situated software company was not \manufacturer\ as defined by city's tax ordinance
- estopping city from relitigating trial court’s decision that identically situated software company was not “manufacturer” as defined by city’s tax ordinance
- applying nonmutual collateral estoppel in civil case, in part because city knew case was pending yet chose not to appeal prior decision
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Presiding Judge J. Steven Stafford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.