Louisa Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A single competitor’s lost profits does not demonstrate a market wide competitive detriment.”
• “Plaintiff offers nothing other than its own projected lost profits to prove that Pepsi’s actions have foreclosed a substantial share of the soft drink market. A single competitor’s lost profits does not demonstrate a market wide competitive detriment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).