Skip to main content
· 1/12/1994

Louis W. Epstein Family Partnership Levitz Furniture Corporation, Intervenor in D.C. v. Kmart Corporation

Citations

  • 13 F.3d 762
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 504
  • 1993 WL 548155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “the district court’s injunction against ‘otherwise’ violating any term of the easement does not give Kmart fair notice as to all the conduct that is enjoined”
  • no deprivation of due process rights where procedural error 14 was corrected through the administrative appeal process
  • If a state court makes factual findings without an opportunity 14 for the petitioner to present evidence, the fact-finding process may be deficient, and the state 15 court opinion may not be entitled to deference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hutchinson, Roth, Stapleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.