Skip to main content
· 10/18/2006

Louis v. McCormick & Schmick Restaurant Corp.

Citations

  • 460 F. Supp. 2d 1153
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81729
  • 2006 WL 3087112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that under Federal Rule of Evidence 201, the Court may 7 take judicial notice of, in relevant part, state agency records
  • holding court may take judicial notice of state agency records
  • “Under Rule 201 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, the court may take judicial notice of the records 26 of state courts, the legislative history of state statutes, and the records of state administrative agencies.”
  • “Under Rule 201 of the Federal Rules of 16 Evidence, the court may take judicial notice of the records of state courts, the legislative history of 17 state statutes, and the records of state administrative agencies.”
  • court may take 28 | judicial notice of state agency records
  • court may take 28 | judicial notice of state agency records

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morrow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.