Louis M. Herman Co. Inc. v. Gallagher Electrical Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in case where plaintiff argued that defendant was estopped from denying the existence of a sales contract, the Court stated “[w]hether there was an estoppel, where it is possible to draw more than one inference from the evidence, was a question of fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).