Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, under Texas law, “[u]ncertainty as to the fact of legal damages is fatal to recovery, but uncertainty as to the amount will not defeat recovery” (quoting McKnight v. Hill & Hill Exterminators, 689 S.W.2d 206, 207 (Tex. 1985))
• Texas law distinguishes “between uncertainty about the fact of damages and uncertainty about the amount of damages”
• “This appeal involves a complex business transaction in which the Appellants agreed to market medical technology owned by the Plaintiff, Dr. Louis M. Dyll.”
• “Under Texas law, courts may ‘impose[ ] a constructive trust on totally innocent beneficiaries of [a] wrongful act.’” (quoting Ginther v. Taub, 675 S.W.2d 724, 728 (Tex. 1984))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).