Skip to main content
· 4/3/1985

Louis Luskin & Sons, Inc. v. Samovitz

Citations

  • 166 Cal. App. 3d 533
  • 212 Cal. Rptr. 612
  • 1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 1855

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • attempt to pressure buyers by part performance within three-day cancellation period was precisely conduct home solicitation sales act was intended to prevent
  • “the usual door-to-door sales situation is not the only scenario in which pressure sales tactics are found”
  • “Although 18 the home solicitation statute is commonly thought of as protecting consumers from the high 19 pressure sales tactics of door-to-door solicitors, the clear, unambiguous language of the statutes 20 gives it a much broader application”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.