· 4/3/1985
Louis Luskin & Sons, Inc. v. Samovitz
Citations
- 166 Cal. App. 3d 533
- 212 Cal. Rptr. 612
- 1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 1855
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- attempt to pressure buyers by part performance within three-day cancellation period was precisely conduct home solicitation sales act was intended to prevent
- “the usual door-to-door sales situation is not the only scenario in which pressure sales tactics are found”
- “Although 18 the home solicitation statute is commonly thought of as protecting consumers from the high 19 pressure sales tactics of door-to-door solicitors, the clear, unambiguous language of the statutes 20 gives it a much broader application”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.