Louis Charles King v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that although the trial judge has discretion to disclose juror contact information, “[t]here is a judicial reluctance” to allow post-verdict contact with jurors
• concluding that an evidentiary hearing was not required because “weakly authenticated, vague, and speculative material” constituted a “frail and ambiguous showing”
• court upheld order requiring jurors to report to FBI if anyone questioned them
• court upheld order requiring jurors to report to FBI if anyone questioned them
• “To overcome this 28 reluctance and to authorize a post-verdict inquiry, there must be ‘clear evidence,’ ‘strong 1 evidence,’ ‘clear and incontrovertible evidence,’ ‘substantial if not wholly conclusive 2 evidence.’”
• reported in table form, 191 F.3d 447, 1999 WL 713865

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).