· 7/11/2012
Loughlin v. Ling
Citations
- 684 F.3d 1289
- 103 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1413
- 2012 WL 2819412
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 14198
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(4)(A) in- corporates a finality requirement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rader, Lourie, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.