Loughborough Dev. Corp. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the Washington Law Against Discrimination (WLAD), chapter 49.60 RCW, is a public policy of the highest priority, it is necessarily dominant
• declining to address whether employee’s conduct actually violated antidiscrimination laws, “which would be analyzed under a very different legal framework”
• ‘‘when an arbitrator’s punishment is so lenient that it will not deter future discrimination—including discrim- ination committed by others—it must be vacated’’
• “This court turns to federal case law for guidance in labor law cases.”
• “We review only the arbitrator’s award and not the underlying conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).