Loudermilk v. Arpaio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, at the summary judgement stage, plaintiff’s “speculative interpretation of the [defendant’s alleged bureaucratic inefficiency and] inaction, without more, is insufficient to permit an inference of intent”
• “[A] plaintiff alleging an Equal Protection violation actionable under § 1983 must establish that the differential treatment it was afforded was intentional, not the result of mere negligence.”
• “[A] plaintiff alleging an Equal Protection violation actionable under § 1983 must establish that the differential treatment it was afforded was intentional, not the result of mete negligence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).