Louden v. Moragne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court’s grant of summary judgment when plaintiff failed to serve the summons within the statute of limitations
• finding section 38-77-160 requires an insured to preserve his right of action against an at-fault driver to be able to seek UIM benefits
• affirming the circuit court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the at-fault driver when the plaintiff failed to serve the at-fault driver within the applicable statute of limitations
• “The fact that any judgment rendered will not ultimately be collected from the named defendant but from the insurance company does not excuse the fundamental requirements of personal service.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).