Louden v. Apollo Gas Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiff should be imputed with constructive knowledge of the unrecorded easement because he knew gas lines ran though his property, and he had visually observed other gas-related objects as well as marker lines on his property
• concluding that the plaintiff should be imputed with constructive knowledge of the unrecorded easement because he knew gas lines ran though his property, and he had visually observed other gas-related objects as well as marker lines on his property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).