Lott v. Scottsdale Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• establishing that parties with disputes over secondary issues are aligned if they have similar interests as to the primary issue
• noting that “defendants are not required to consent to removal given the realignment [of the] defendants as plaintiffs for jurisdictional purposes”
• noting defendants were not required to consent to removal given their realignment as plaintiffs for jurisdictional purposes
• noting defendants were not required to consent to removal given their realignment as plaintiffs for jurisdictional purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).