Skip to main content
· 8/23/1951

LOSEE Et Ux. v. JONES Et Ux.

Citations

  • 235 P.2d 132
  • 120 Utah 385
  • 1951 Utah LEXIS 218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “the intention of the parties is the controlling consideration” in reforming a deed where the calls of a metes-and-bounds description “fail[ed] to close”
  • looking to the intent of the parties to reform a deed in which the metes and bounds description failed to close the property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crockett, Wolfe, Wade, McDonough, Henriod

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.