Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co. v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding in a personal-injury suit that a limitation on liability was valid because “by its terms, [the utility’s tariff] applies to negligence actions without regard to the nature of the damages sought”
• enforcing a tariff to preclude personal-injury claims and recognizing the existence of “an equitable trade-off—the power to regulate rates and to set them below the amount an unregulated provider might otherwise charge requires a concomitant limitation on liability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).