Los Alamos Study Group v. United States Department of Energy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that agency action was not final, even after the issuance of an EIS, while preparations for a supplemental study were ongoing and the agency had not yet entered its conclusive decision
• “[W]hen considering a Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss, a court may weigh the evidence and make factual findings.”
• “A claim is not ripe for adjudication if it rests upon contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all.” (quoting Texas v. United States, 523 U.S. 296, 300 (1998) (internal quotation marks omitted))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).