Lorna Clarke v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he statute of limitations in section 2255 is just that—a statute of limitations, not a jurisdictional limitation, and so it can be tolled.”
• defendant on supervised release is in custody for purposes of habeas corpus and therefore cannot seek a writ of coram nobis
• equitable tolling is a basis on which a § 2255 movant can “avoid the bar of the statute of limitations.”
• \[T]he sentence did not become final until the deadline for filing a notice of appeal expired.\
• supervised release is “classified as a form of custody” for purposes of habeas corpus
• supervised release is “classified as a form of custody” for purposes of habeas corpus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).