Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Chester, Willcox & Saxbe, LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the judicial-estoppel doctrine is applied cautiously and that “there is no inconsistency, and certainly no clear inconsistency” in the challenged arguments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).