Skip to main content
· 12/23/2009

Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. CHESTER, WILLCOX & SAXBE

Citations

  • 589 F.3d 835
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 28353
  • 2009 WL 4980372

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that an anti-suit injunction of state court proceedings was necessary in aid of district court’s jurisdiction over complex class settlement fund in a non-MDL case
  • concluding that an anti‐suit injunction of state court proceedings was necessary in aid of district court’s jurisdiction over com‐ plex class settlement fund in a non‐MDL case
  • affirming an All Writs Act injunction of 1 action settlement agreement under the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal district court
  • A settled class action may bar later claims “even though the precluded claim was not presented, and could not have been presented, in the class action itself.”
  • “[W]hen a court issues an injunction, it automatically retains jurisdiction to enforce it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gilman, Kethledge, Bertelsman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.