Skip to main content
· 4/13/2005

Lori Schrott v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

Citations

  • 403 F.3d 940
  • 66 Fed. R. Serv. 1225
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6073
  • 2005 WL 844958

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “By conceding that this essential element of her case could not be proven, Schrott left the court with no option but to grant the defendants’ summary judgment motion.”
  • conceded facts contrary to essential allegations cannot support claim at summary judgment
  • plaintiff must show causal link existed between defendant’s conduct and damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Wood, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.