Skip to main content
· 3/27/1980

Lori Byrd Martin v. Chesebrough-Pond's, Inc., Defendant-Third-Party Foster Forbes Glass Company, Third-Party

Citations

  • 614 F.2d 498
  • 53 A.L.R. Fed. 894
  • 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 19168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • district court’s decision regarding the order of argument was not inconsistent with substantial justice under Rule 61
  • finding “no abuse of discretion in refusing [the co-defendant’s] rebuttal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Godbold, Reavley, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.