LORETTE PIERRE, MAGDADENE DIEUVIL, and GUILFORT DIEUVIL v. RANDALL POWELL

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that City of Seattle’s failure to 23 address lawlessness and crime occurring in the Capitol Hill Occupied Protection (“CHOP”
• observing that “[a] particularized danger, naturally, contrasts with a general one” and must be “directed at a ESTATE OF SOAKAI V. ABDELAZIZ 43 specific victim”
• “[W]e have recognized implicitly that parents maintain a constitutionally 25 protected liberty interest in the companionship of their adult children.”
• “Plaintiffs’ state-created danger claim targets not the injuries caused by the crash itself but the additional risk faced by Plaintiffs after the crash due to delayed medical treatment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).