· 9/3/2010
Loreto v. Procter & Gamble Co.
Citations
- 737 F. Supp. 2d 909
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91699
- 2010 WL 3471752
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- absence of private right of action to enforce FDCA “does not mean ... that state law claims are completely precluded simply because the conduct violates the FDCA”
- no loss when the “consumer gets what he/she paid for”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Timothy S. Black
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.